Friday, August 27, 2010

FILM REVIEW: THE MILK OF SORROW




Swallowing the Shining Path

By Don Simpson

While on her deathbed, an elderly Peruvian woman (Barbara Lazon) sings a tale of woe about being raped and forced-fed her dead husband's gunpowder-seasoned penis during the Sendero Luminoso’s Shining Path campaigns of the 1980s. The woman’s daughter, Fausta (Magaly Solier), purportedly consumed her mother’s fear from these events when, as a child, she suckled the milk of sorrow from her mother’s “frightened teats.”

Fausta’s vacant and timorous soul has been overburdened, if not totally overrun, by fear. She walks the streets with blank black eyes revealing only one emotion -- sheer terror -- as she cowers closely to the walls purportedly to avoid evil spirits, but more likely to avoid people. Lacking in social skills and petrified of the outside world, Fausta is forced to find employment upon her mother’s death in order to afford the proper burial that her mother deserves. Armed with a strategically placed potato which protects her against potential sexual violators and songs which pour out from her subconscious in order to sooth her nerves, the beautiful yet silent Fausta hesitantly begins working as a servant for a rich doña in Lima.

Based on Kimberly Theidon’s book, Entre Prójimos, Peruvian director Claudia Llosa’s allegorical film details the long-lasting effects from the Sendero Luminoso’s shameless raping of Peruvian women. Llosa’s magic realism sensibilities allow her to walk the fine line between the grim nature of the content and visually lyrical yet absurdly comedic moments. The film never opts to show flashback footage of the violence, rape and torture, but the tragedies haunt ever single frame of the narrative. The unspeakable history is kept off-screen because in reality these crimes are seldom discussed by Peruvians -- though the psychological aftermath lingers long after the victims have passed away. Also, by not revealing the atrocious acts on screen it makes the content of The Milk of Sorrow somewhat less painful for the audience to swallow as the heinousness exists quite subtly in tone alone.

The Milk of Sorrow is essentially about a repressed population that can only express their innermost feelings via myths, such as la teta asustada, and folk songs. They pass this information from one generation to the next as to never forget what horrors exist in this world. It is a warning to never let your guard down, to be prepared. This history of oral culture functions as a collective memory; yet this leaves future generations, like Fausta, fearful of life and devastatingly suspicious of people she does not know. Thus, probably the most societally crippling consequence of the horrors of the Sendero Luminoso is the creation of the fear of the unknown and of the other. How can a nation survive as a cohesive whole when a segment of its population lives in such a constant state of distrust of their neighbors? (Suckle on that for a while, Tea Partiers!)

The Milk of Sorrow won the Golden Bear for best film at the 2009 Berlin International Film Festival and was nominated for the Best Foreign Language Picture at the 82nd Academy Awards.

Thursday, August 26, 2010

FILM REVIEW: THE LAST EXORCISM


Nell (Ashley Bell) is on her way to hell in The Last Exorcism.

Promise?

By Don Simpson

Directed by Daniel Stamm, The Last Exorcism is another notch in the “faux documentary”-cum-”found footage” horror film bedpost. 

The film is set-up on the premise that a guerrilla documentary crew is following a disillusioned preacher named Cotton Marcus (Patrick Fabian) who hopes to reveal the ignorance and superstition that is fueling a recent resurgence in exorcisms, as well as the dangers that exorcisms pose to the “possessed” individuals (especially children). 

Delving briefly into Cotton’s past, we learn that he grew up as the son of a preacher man and prominent exorcist; Cotton then took up his father’s profession at a young age beginning as a “child preacher.” Presently, Cotton admits that his belief in God is wavering, but he understands how others can find solace in what he can provide by way of his charismatic performances as a preacher.

Cotton’s plan is for the filmmakers to document his last exorcism -- one of a possessed teenage girl named Nell (Ashley Bell) -- before he retires. Nell is suspected by her father (Louis Herthum) to be slaughtering their family livestock, apparently while in a trance state. Nell’s father became a devout fundamental Christian and alcoholic after the death of his wife; afraid that his children would be corrupted by the evils of modern society he keeps them on a tight leash and even home-schools them. Cotton, knowing in his heart that demons do not exist, ascertains that the stress of Nell’s mother’s death and her father’s extreme and restricting behavior is the root cause of Nell’s “possession.” Cotton can only hope that his performance as exorcist will be convincing enough to cure Nell’s purely psychosomatic manifestations, but this exorcism occurs so early in the narrative, that it is quite obvious that it will not be successful. This is where the true horror story begins, as Nell’s condition is not as one-dimensional as everyone had anticipated.

The Last Exorcism is a very strange horror film, one that takes a long time to get to the fright fest. Stamm’s film sets off on very patient path during the first act in order to establish sufficient back story and character development to make the second act more worthwhile -- at least for those of us who are more interested in plot than thrills and chills. Basically, The Last Exorcism is not a film to see for its ability to shock ‘n awe y’all; instead, it is a character study -- which, yes, eventually moseys its way into a no-holds-barred horror film -- that is carried on the shoulders of Fabian and Bell’s noteworthy performances.

Additionally, Stamm’s film is significantly more thought-provoking and philosophical than the average horror film. Though The Last Exorcism never blatantly mocks the God-fearing Christians of the Bible Belt, it does question some of the fundamental beliefs and practices of Christianity. Cotton’s opinion of preachers is not too far off from my own -- they are merely entertainers whose purpose is two-fold: make the congregation feel good and earn money. Many (if not most) Christian sects utilize fear as a means of control and manipulation, and this is where the devil and demons come in. But not only do the devil and demons provide Christians something to fear, they also provide excuses for whenever Christians veer off of their perfect Christian path. And some people veer farther from the path than others -- that is where exorcisms come in. Rather than admitting that people do bad things on their own, we are supposed to believe that the devil made them do it or that they were possessed by demons. We are also to believe that a preacher, minister or priest (depending on the Christian sect) have the power -- by channeling God, of course -- to expel demons from people. (I’m only using Christianity as an example here -- there are plenty of other religions that use similar tactics to achieve similar goals.) 

The Last Exorcism thoughtfully and cleverly takes Christianity to task, but that is not to say that Stamm is denouncing God. In fact the ending takes such an extreme right turn, that it becomes difficult to really know what Stamm and the film’s writers, Huck Botko and Andrew Gurland, really believe. Essentially, everyone associated with The Last Exorcism -- from the fictional characters to the filmmakers to the audience -- is in search of the absolute Truth and said Truth might be beyond all of us.

Unfortunately, The Last Exorcism really does not succeed as the ”found footage” film that it purports to be, mainly because there are too many sequences that feel contrived as if they were manipulated and edited in post-production. The ”found footage” genre only succeeds whenever the director decides to go “all in” and establish strict guidelines in order to retain full authenticity (and that authenticity was well within the reach of Stamm, Botko and Gurland) -- this is where few “found footage” films succeed (Trash Humpers and Jimmy Tupper vs. the Goatman of Bowie) and many fail (Cloverfield, Blair Witch Project and Paranormal Activity). And, without divulging spoilers, I just will say that the ending does not offer any logical explanation that the film will ever be found and shown.

With a little more attention to “found footage” details and a much different ending (if not an entirely different third act), The Last Exorcism could have been a much better film. I went into The Last Exorcism with absolutely no expectations, but I was so impressed by the first two acts that the third act really frustrated me. As for Stamm’s decision to utilize the hyper-real “found footage” film-making perspective to tell this story, well I don’t think it was all that necessary. I don’t think this choice in perspective really added anything to the narrative, if anything it just makes the story seem much more contrived. 

FILM REVIEW: THE PEOPLE I'VE SLEPT WITH

Jefferson (Archie Kao) and Angela (Karin Anna Cheung) in The People I've Slept With.

Dealing with the deck

By Miranda Inganni

“A slut is just a woman with the morals of a man,” says Angela (Karin Anna Cheung), the protagonist in director Quentin Lee’s The People I’ve Slept With. While one has long heard the idea that a man who sleeps around is a stud, but a woman who does the same is a slut, this movie ignores all of it. And thank goodness for that.

Angela loves sex and good for her, but when she becomes pregnant and isn’t sure who the father is, she relies on her deck of cards. Sort of like baseball cards, Angela's cards are a photo collection of the guys she’s had sex with, each one with a nickname -- Mystery Man, Mr. Hottie, 5-Second Guy...You get the/her picture(s).

As she works her way through the stack of cards, she realizes that Mystery Man, AKA Jefferson Lee (Archie Kao) is the most qualified mate -- regardless of whether he is the biological father or not. And regardless of his disagreeable politics.

Angela also confides in best friend, Gabriel (Wilson Cruz), who happens to be gay, and, ultimately, to her seemingly perfect sister, Juliet (Lynn Chen). Each has their idea as to what Angela should do as far as the pregnancy is concerned.

Blighted with some occasionally weak acting, this charming, mildly controversial, frequently funny, hormone-driven, sweet story is a glimpse into the ideal choice one could make if one were presented with the option of what one could do if they had the chance to make the ultimate parental choice.
 

Monday, August 23, 2010

LA LATINO INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL 2010: ADIOS LALIFF?

My comrade Ron Blair in Memories of Overdevelopment. 

Future for LALIFF looks bleak, reviews
 

By Ed Rampell

I was introduced this year to the Los Angeles Latino International Film Festival (LALIFF), which shines the limelight on Latino filmmakers and cinema, but according to LALIFF Chairman and co-founder, writer-director-producer-actor Edward James Olmos (Stand and Deliver; American Me), the film festival may be taking its final curtain call this year. Olmos, who presented each screening I attended during LALIFF’s 14th annual fete, told ticket buyers that there might not be a 15th year because the LALIFF's budget has been cut by 55 percent.


That would be a great pity, because an important cultural institution could be lost to us, and along with it the ability to see numerous entertainment industry panels, conversations, features, documentaries, animated and live action shorts Angelenos might not otherwise have the opportunity to watch (at least not on the big screen). Films like New Children/New York -- a documentary about the struggles of three aspiring immigrant filmmakers in Brooklyn by director Gisela Sanders Alcantara and screenwriter-producer Lauren Mucciolo, to the remarkable avante garde feature, Memories of Overdevelopment, which stars my old Hunter College film school classmate, Ron Blair -- might be relegated to home viewing.

Memories of Overdevelopment is the sequel to the 1968 Cuban classic, Memories of Underdevelopment, directed by Tomas Gutierrez Alea, based on the novel by Edmundo Desnoes. The older film is about a Cuban intellectual who, unlike most of his upper class relatives and friends, decides to stick it out and stick around in his native country after Castro’s 1959 revolution in order to see what happens to his country. The feature is notable for its theme of alienation, which contrasted sharply with the so-called “socialist realism” of Soviet and Eastern European cinema (which was, generally, neither socialist or realistic). 

In 1979, around the time of the Mariel Boatlift (or, as the Fidelistas called it, “Operation Adios Gusanos!”), Desnoes moved to New York, and his novel Memories of Overdevelopment is a sort of sequel to the work he’s best known. In Cuban director Miguel Coyula’s screen adaptation, the Cuba-born Blair depicts Desnoes’ alter ego, an estranged academic and intellectual who has a penchant for disastrous affairs, collages and existential angst, living off of his former glory as a writer of the revolution he no longer believes in. 

When we went to Hunter I remember Blair aspiring to be a cameraman, and not a thespian. According to Coyula, this is Blair's first acting role, and he does a good job as the long suffering, taciturn lead character. (As I recall, Blair was actually quite the temperamental artiste, so this was either good acting technique on his part or he has mellowed over the decades.)

However, for the record, I’d like to point out that contrary to Memories of Overdevelopment, to paraphrase Mark Twain, the news of the death of the Cuban revolution and of Castro are greatly exaggerated. I can remember when Cuba was a pariah in the Yanqui dominated Western Hemisphere and was excluded from membership in the Organization of American States. But, and methinks this is simply a statement of fact, and not an ideological assertion, Cuba and Castro are currently held in higher esteem now throughout Latin America and the Caribbean than at any time since Che Guevara and Castro triumphantly marched out of the Sierra Maestras and into Havana -- and the history books. Oliver Stone’s new documentary, South of the Border, about South America’s new left-leaning presidents -- such as Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez and Bolivia’s Evo Morales -- makes this regional admiration and acceptance of Cuba clear.
Prakriti Maduro plays the titular character in Habana Eva.
  
LALIFF also screened another feature about Cuba, co-writer and director Fina Torres’ sexy comedy with liberal doses of magical realism, Habana Eva.


Habana Eva tells the tale of Eva (Prakriti Maduro), a Cuban seamstress who has her designs on becoming a haute couture fashion designer, but her entrepreneurial flair and initiative is stifled by a factory bureaucrat in this parable of the dilemmas facing contemporary Cuba. In addition, Eva is wooed by two lovers -- one of them representing Cuban socialism, the other, a Cuban born photographer who lives in Venezuela, symbolizing bourgeois values. Eva’s amusing choice is a prophecy of Cuba’s future in the near future, and a far cry from the revolutionary zeal of Humberto Solas’ famed 1968 Cuban feminist film, Lucia. 

Like Polynesian vahines, Cuban muchachas were famed for their beauty and sensuality, and Cuban women epitomized the silver screen stereotypes of those “hot Latin lovers.” In Habana Eva Torres seems to be toying with these torrid tropical tropes. But, ideology aside, the problem with this movie is that Eva’s friend, Teresa (Yuliet Cruz), outshines her in all of the scenes they appear together. Teresa is simply sexier, prettier, funnier and more likable and vivacious than Eva (even when she’s dead and becomes a Fellini-esque Yuliet of the spirits!). Cruz simply steals every scene. (When she’s offscreen viewers may make that Shakespearian pleading: “Wherefore art thou Yuliet?”) To top matters off, Yuliet Cruz is actually Cuban, while Prakriti Maduro is Venezuelan. The comparison between the two is similar to comparing Natalie Wood as Maria and Rita Moreno as Anita in West Side Story. But this is a quibble, Habana Eva is a rollicking sex farce with great location shooting in Cuba.

A scene from The Storm that Swept Mexico.
 
The best film I saw at LALIFF was Raymond Telles’ well-made, highly informative documentary, The Storm that Swept Mexico. This ambitious film tells the story of the Mexican Revolution, pointing out that it was the first major revolution of the 20th century. And what a thrilling cast of characters: Pancho Villa, Emiliano Zapata, and a cast of thousands of horse riding rebels, revealed in vintage film clips and through insightful narration (including veterans of the century-old uprising). The two-hour documentary is a panoply of Mexican history -- the murals, Sergei Eisenstein’s Que Viva Mexico! and more -- all breathlessly crammed into this saga that stretches from pre-1910 to the brutal suppression of student demos in 1968. All one could say was “Bravo” and “Viva”! 

On another note, one unique touch brought by the Western Beauty Institute to LALIFF’s filmmakers, sponsors, volunteers and journalists were complimentary haircuts, manicures, makeup, etc., provided by WBI graduating pupils in a hotel room at the nearby Renaissance Hollywood Hotel. I had a relaxing back facial skillfully, expertly administered by a soon-to-graduate student named Jessica. This brilliant marketing idea was the brainchild of WBI’s Creative Director Judi Jordan.

Maybe it will be these type of non-film activities marketing pizzazz that could help save the cash-strapped LALIFF. Film lovers and the creative community should stand by and deliver LALIFF so that it can continue to showcase Latino movies. 

Don’t force Olmos to make Zoot Suit II in order to finance LALIFF out of his own pocket.

LALIFF 2010 runs through August 25. For more information: 323/469-9066; www.latinofilm.org    

 





 

LA LATINO INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL 2010: GO FOR IT!

Carmen (Aimee Garcia) and Gina (Gina Rodriquez) in Go for it!

The dramas of a dancer

By Miranda Inganni

A very busy, young lady, Carmen (Aimee Garcia) attends community college, works at a local market, practices her dance by day, then spends some nights dancing competitively at an underground club in Chicago.

Carmen goes to school and work to keep her working class parents happy; dancing is what she really loves. Speaking of love, Carmen begins to date and then fall in love with one of her classmates, Jared (Derrick Denicola), a boy from a rich part of Chicago.

But neither Carmen nor her family is satisfied with her efforts, with the tensions culminating in a nasty fight where Carmen runs away to live with her best friend, Gina (Gina Rodriguez).

Compounding the drama, Carmen is encouraged to pursue her love of dance by her teacher, Mr. Martin (Al Bandiero), who has his own issues of identity, while being forced to face the cruel truth of Gina’s abusive relationship with her guy, Nino (Rene Rosado).

A movie less about dancing than about growing up, facing facts and dealing with life, writer-director-producer Carmen Marron’s debut feature Go for It! is based on Marron’s experiences as a street dancer and one of ten children in a Mexican-American family. It’s a lot of experience to put into one movie, but Marron’s message behind the movie is admirable: follow your dreams and believe in yourself.

The movie should be commended, too, for its stance on education, yet it tries too hard to make Go for It! a “feel good” film. In addition, the character stereotypes, the excessive flying hair in the dance scenes, and Carmen and Gina's adolescent behavior is unoriginal, if not plain annoying. And the direction during the dance scenes is more claustrophobic than energetic. The film’s tagline, “She wasn’t the best…it didn’t matter,” rings true of the movie.

Still, Marron does “go for it,” writing, producing, directing and her first film. She also has a small acting part in the film as the Fancy Store Saleswoman.

(Go for It! screens August 24, 5:30 p.m., Mann Theatre 1)

Saturday, August 21, 2010

FILM REVIEW: ARMY OF CRIME


Lining up for an Army of Crime.

Dieing on their feet

By Don Simpson
 
They were twenty-three when the rifles blossomed
Twenty-three who gave their hearts before their time
Twenty-three foreigners but still our brothers
Twenty-three who loved life to death
Twenty-three who cried out “France!” as they fell.
                                            -- Louis Aragon, Strophes pour se souvenir

The phrase "army of crime" is a reference to a caption on the Affiche Rouge ("red poster"), a propaganda poster campaign with which the Nazis sought to present French resistance fighters as criminals: "Liberators? Liberation by the army of crime." 

Based on the true stories of the Francs-tireurs et partisans - Main-d'œuvre immigrée (FTP-MOI), Army of Crime begins with an Altman-esque intertwining of the very individual narratives concerning a multifarious hodgepodge of anti-fascists operating clandestinely and individually in occupied Paris (a city that seems to have accepted German occupation and the mass deportations of its Jewish residents with timid acquiescence). Eventually the characters realize that their strength would be in numbers and they trade their solitary acts of resistance to join together as an organized underground operation. Led by Missak Manouchian (Simon Abkarian), a real-life Armenian poet and card-carrying communist, the ragtag team also includes the hotheaded Polish Jew Marcel Rayman (Robinson Stévenin), Hungarian member of the communist youth Thomas Elek (Grégoire Leprince-Ringuet) and Polish Jewish communist Joseph Epstein (Lucas Belvaux).

By introducing the characters individually first, director Robert Guédiguian establishes their individual motives for their acts of resistance. Manouchian, for one, is reluctant to kill let alone handle a handgun; he explains to his wife, "I always felt revenge was an awful idea." But after becoming the leader of the FTP-MOI and making his first kill -- a grenade attack on a small marching brigade of SS men -- Manouchian never expresses any future misgivings about violence. "You can't turn back," he explains. Epstein legitimizes the group’s violence by stating, "We kill people, but we're on the side of life."

Functioning as a cinematic antidote -- or palate cleanser -- to Quentin Tarantino’s ultra violent Inglorious Basterds, this French resistance drama makes a concerted effort to focus on the moral and ethical compromises required when one acts in vengeful opposition to their oppressors. Guédiguian also calls into question the moral and ethical dilemmas related to the seemingly necessary acts of compromise between the free French and their oppressors. The majority of the FTP-MOI opt for total non-compromise (pointedly refusing to give up their comrades during interrogations), but there are some squealers and others, including Manouchian himself, who are willing to denounce their heartfelt beliefs in order to survive. Probably the most questionable compromise is made by Raymon's Jewish girlfriend, Monique (Lola Naymark), who engages in sex acts with a French police investigator.

Unfortunately, Army of Crime ends up being most interested in trumping up the sentimentality of the martyrdom of its characters, as is exemplified in the opening and closing sequences in which the captured resistance members names are recited by an off screen voice as they near their impending executions.

Friday, August 20, 2010

LA LATINO INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL 2010: BEDROOMS

Pizza Man Sal (Jesse Garcia) delivers a slice in Bedrooms.


Bittersweet bed-sprung symphonies

By John Esther


Making its world premiere at LALIFF 2010, Bedrooms examines several different couples on the precipice of their relationship in four intermittent segments.

Written and directed by Victor Tehran, in the "Beth and Julian" segment things are a bit dry in the lovemaking department for Beth (Moon Bloodgood) and Julian (Jordan Belfi). He wants it, but she does not and she cannot, or will not, say why. This frustrates Julian because he wants their marriage to work. This only makes Beth feel more guilty for her lack of desire.

Written and directed by Youssef Delarra, in the "Anna, Sal and Harry" segment, a kept woman, Anna (Julie Benz) and the newly arrived "Pizza Man" Sal (Jesse Garcia) are trying spontaneous sex, but something is stopping her. Rather than focus on getting some action from the rich lady, Sal backs away to offer a fresh perspective to Anna about how to deal with her situation.

Directed by Delara and written by Wynne Renz, in the "Marnie, Walter and Roger" segment, an older couple, Marnie (Dee Wallace) and Roger (Barry Bostwick), are coming to the point of no return in her four-year extramarital affair. Roger wants her to leave her sick husband, Walter (Enn Reitel), since Roger loves Marnie and Walter does not love her(so they believe), but when Roger tells her a deep secret he has been carrying for years, there is only bed to lay and lie in henceforth.

Directed by Michael D. Olmos and written by Rebecca Woolf, in the "Janet, Max and Daisy" segment, two ten-old twins named Max (Dylan Sprayberry) and Daisy (Ellery Sprayberry) have to find ways to entertain themselves while mommy (Sarah Clarke) leaves long phone messages to her estranged husband, John, as she waits for her artistic powers to ignite. When the kids realize bickering will not relieve the tension, they create their own art stemming from the despair felt throughout the house.

Rather than run the four segments consecutively, Bedrooms slides between the bedrooms -- creating an intense and suspenseful result. (While these qualities make for engaging drama, I imagine the intermittent pacing could get a bit nerve wrecking for impatient or uncomfortable viewers/couples strongly identifying with one of the characters or couple's situation.)

Sure, Bedrooms can be a bit stagy at times, considering the mise-en-scène, and the "Janet, Max and Daisy" does not exactly fit with the rest of the material, but the screenwriting here is superb and most of the actors live up to the material. There are some very raw emotions and genuine dialogue here, creating an insightful look at individuals trying miserably to cope with the fact they are deeply loved. 

Recommended. 
 
(Bedrooms screens tonight at 9:20 p.m., Mann Theatre 1)



LA LATINO INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL 2010: FORGED

Chuco (Manny Perez) takes a few shots for his families in Forged.

A gun of a son

By John Esther

Recently released from prison due to good behavior, no sooner does Chuco (Manny Perez) take a few steps of freedom before he finds himself trapped by his old criminal "family" and the homeless son, Machito (David Castro), he left behind and who now wants to kill his father.

Sort of thinking and trying to do what is right, the more Chuco acts like a father the more he will have to answer for his crimes. 

An intense drama with notable photography by Zeus Morand and art direction by Robert Haley,  the finely directed film by William Wedig is the kind of authentic independent film we need more of when we attend film festivals. Co-written by Perez and Wedig.

Recommended. 

(Forged screens tonight, 7:30 p.m., Mann Theatre 1)

Thursday, August 19, 2010

LA LATINO INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL 2010: CRUZ REYNOSO

Cruz Reynoso: A life dedicated to the law. 

And justice for all

By John Esther  

Born May 2, 1931, in Brea, California, Cruz Reynoso started breaking the rule-rs from an early age. The third child of nine, Cruz challenged the stereotypes of child Latino workers that some school officials possessed by speaking English fluently, then his mother when he said he wanted to continue with his education rather than drop out at the age of 16 and work on a farm with the family. 

After graduating from Pomona College, Reynoso served two years in the U.S. Army before entering Boalt Hall at UC Berkely where he was the the only Latino in the law school. After law school, Reynoso migrated south to set up shop in El Centro, California, where he soon rose to the top of his profession, gaining positive attention for his work on behalf of working farmers and, accordingly, some negative attention from then-California Governor Ronald Reagen. 

A divisive figure in political circles, as much as Reagen disliked Reynoso's rigorous application of the law, then-California Governor Jerry Brown appointed Reynoso to the California Supreme Court where he became a part of the estimable and anti-death penalty Rose Bird Supreme Court until California Republicans ran a misleading, particularly politicized, and irresponsible campaign for the judicial-retention election of 1986, which saw the expulsion of Bird, Reynoso and fellow Justice Joseph Grodin. 

Throughout his life Reynoso worked tirelessly on behalf of poor and disenfranchised people across this country, teaching, inspiring, collaborating with Cesar Chavez, and even getting involved in the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election hijacking in Florida. Reynoso has lead a full life and one intricately tied to many important events in California and America's recent history. 

Fortunately, Abby Ginzberg's documentary captures the man and the events in a quick, entertaining fashion (although I would cut out the scenes with horses). Cruz as a father and husband are barley addressed and that is good. At times, Ginzberg takes for granted viewers will know the exact time and places of the events, and does lead one a bit astray with location (again, the horses), but those are minor drawbacks to this 58-minute documentary about an extraordinary man who loves America's brightest ideals and who has fought for them almost all the time. 

(Cruz Reynoso: Sowing the Seeds of Justice screens August 20, 6:05 p.m., Mann Theatre 2)

LA LATINO INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL 2010: PREVIEW

Marcel Rasquin's Hermano opens LALIFF 2010. 

Viva Cinema!

By John Esther 

Starting a little earlier in the calendar year than usual, the Los Angeles Latino International Film Festival (LALIFF) will run August 19-25, screening 25 features, 12 documentaries and 37 short films, plus conducting panels and parties , too.

Tonight the 14th LAIFF commences with the opening night film, Hermano. Directed by Marcel Rasquin, Hermano tells the story of two poor young Venezuelan brothers caught between the crossroads of life, duty and the game of soccer. Screening at the Mann Chinese 6 in Hollywood, the opening gala follows at The Highlands.  

For more information go to http://www.latinofilm.org/

 

FILM REVIEW: SOUL KITCHEN

Nadine (Pheline Roggan) leaving Zinos (Adam Bousdoukos) in Soul Kitchen

Loss of appetite


By John Esther


After sending the electrifying films, Head-On and The Edge of Heaven, our way, Turkish-German filmmaker Fatih Akin sizzles out with his latest film, Soul Kitchen. 

Still trying to keep Soul Kitchen, his horrible Hamburg restaurant running, Zinos (Adam Bousdoukos) has had better days. His girlfriend, Nadine (Pheline Roggan), is heading far east and his criminal brother, Illias (Moritz Bleibtreu), is once again back in his life. Then there is Thomas Neumann (Wotan Wilke Möhring), who is pressuring, openly and covertly, Zinos to sell his restaurant because he wants the property. 

Life does not look good for Zinos until he hires Shayn (Birol Ünel), a brilliant chef with an uncompromising attitude. Now Soul Kitchen is a huge success, the brothers are united and life is almost perfect. But Zinos still loves Nadine and is willing to gamble on everything to get her back. Can he do it? Never fear, like a typical Hollywood movie fulfilling its duty to assure on all accounts, Zinos will be just fine.

Baked with a lot of lousy music, weak acting, clichéd characters and tropes, Soul Kitchen fails to display any of Akin's talents found in Head-On or The Edge of Heaven, without replacing them with anything else of value. 

Sell out?





FILM REVIEW: BROTHERHOOD

I love you, man

By Don Simpson

Recently dismissed from the Danish army as a direct result of rumors of his homosexual behavior, Lars (Thure Lindhardt), the dashing 22-year-old quintessential Aryan, falls in with a gang of neo-Nazi hoodlums whose leader Michael “Fatty” (Nicolas Bro) sees potential in Lars' intelligent, eloquent and confrontational nature. The primary targets of the members of this local branch of the National Socialists are the “Pakis” who are purportedly settling in Denmark for the sole purpose of acquiring social services and financial assistance (similar to the Tea Party’s perception of “foreigners” in the United States.)

After being booted from his parents’ home, Lars is sent to shack up with one of the group’s A-members, Jimmy (David Dencik), in a cozy seaside house being remodeled for Ebbe (Claus Flygare), the supreme leader of the organization. Jimmy is assigned the task of prepping Lars on the rules of a lifetime A-membership, which Lars has promptly been offered. (Fatty also advices Jimmy to “just make sure [Lars] doesn’t get too cocky.”) The A-membership requires that one pledge to fight for white supremacy, promise to live in harmony with nature’s laws (Jimmy drinks organic beer because it’s important not to “fuck up nature”) and become familiar with the vision of the Third Reich. Though the shaved-skulled Hitler youth enjoy such homoerotic activities as wrestling shirtless, skinny dipping and slamming each other’s sweaty bodies together (a.k.a. slam-dancing), they have an unspoken hatred for “faggots.” As Lars points out -- Hitler had Ernst Rohm, one of his closest allies, executed because he was queer. 

Unfortunately for Jimmy and Lars, they fall in love with each other putting their memberships and lives in peril.

Yes, our anti-heroes Lars and Jimmy are extremely bigoted and violent and they certainly don't deserve our sympathy in any way; but Nicolo Donato’s nuanced direction makes certain that we grant it to them anyway. Donato ensures that we experience the human side of Lars and Jimmy as well as grow to detest the predicament of forbidden love that they find themselves entwined within. This places the audience in a very awkward position: Are we being sympathetic toward two gay men or two extreme racists…or both? Considering that neither Lars nor Jimmy show any signs of wavering on their stance regarding the “Pakis,” it looks like we are stuck sympathizing with racists…but we can only hope that they will change their minds.

The National Socialists may not currently have a stronghold in United States’ politics, but it’s difficult not to see similarities between the propaganda in the film and that of the Tea Party (who have yet to release a defining platform, but whose figureheads have expressed anti-immigrant and homophobic sentiments on countless occasions). We may have thought we defeated Hitler and his crazy ideologies in 1945, but Brotherhood is a bitter reminder that judgments based purely on race, religion and sexual orientation still exist (as if we still need a reminder after the passage of bills such as California’s Proposition 8 and Arizona’s SB 1070).

THEATER REVIEW: THE GOOD NEGRO/CARRY IT ON!


Civil rights and wrongs onstage at two L.A. theatres.

By Ed Rampell

Art emerges out of our collective psyche to reflect our times, and it’s fascinating to see how Los Angeles theatre is responding to the current attack on our civil, human and constitutional rights and liberties. Radio talk show host Randi Rhodes calls this “the Summer of Hate.” This month Republican Congressman Mike Rogers publicly condemned “the culture of disclosure,” declaring that Private Bradley Manning should be tried for “treason” for allegedly leaking classified information to WikiLeaks, and if found guilty, Manning should be executed. Also in August journalist Michael Hastings -- whose Rolling Stone article led to the dismissal of Gen. Stanley McChrystal as U.S. commander in Afghanistan -- was refused permission to embed with American forces in Afghanistan. We’re also witnessing the troubling phenomenon of attempts to rollback hard won rights, such as: reversals of same sex marriage; repeal of 14th amendment citizenship guarantees (which originally conferred U.S. rights on freed slaves); efforts to deny Muslims First Amendment religious rights to build an Islamic center on private property near Ground Zero; open-ended investigations of scientists and other employees at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena -- which the Ninth Circuit court unanimously issued an injunction against in 2008 -- goes before the U.S. Supreme Court Oct. 5; etc.

It’s noteworthy that hard on the heels of the Aug. 8 end of the Geffen’s run of Thurgood, starring Laurence Fishburne as the first Black Supreme Court Justice, Thurgood Marshall, two more L.A. productions opened this August dealing with the Civil Rights movement. The playbill for The Good Negro insightfully asserts: “This show, being produced at this time in history, is particularly apt.” 

Indeed.
 
Playwright Tracey Scott Wilson’s drama, which is having its West Coast premiere at Hollywood’s illustrious Stella Adler Theatre, is set in 1962 at Birmingham, Alabama, which the play calls “America’s most segregated city.” Press notes plus the playbill refer to this time as “the early civil rights struggle,” but I’d dispute this assertion. Rosa Parks had triggered a boycott at Montgomery, Alabama after she defied apartheid mass transit laws in 1955. Emmett Till (subject of another 2010 L.A. play) had been brutally murdered earlier that year, so by 1962, the Civil Rights movement had arguably moved beyond its “early” years (the Dr. Martin Luther King-led march on Washington took place in 1963).

This may seem like a mere quibble, but if a dramatist uses history as his/her raw material, details such as this are important. In The Good Negro Wilson draws upon and fictionalizes actual events and personages, such as: The vicious murder of the three civil rights workers James Chaney, Andrew Goodman and Michael Schwerner; the 1963 bombing of a Birmingham church that killed four little girls; the FBI’s surveillance of and vendetta against Dr. King; King’s alleged philandering; and more.

I won’t spoil The Good Negro’s plot for you, but suffice it to say that after a black woman named Claudette Sullivan (the captivating, curvaceous Theresa Deveaux) breaks one of the segregated South’s apartheid rules, a mass movement erupts, including protest marches, boycotts, the Ku Klux Klan, etc. (The astute and feminist reader will note my references to Claudette’s physical characteristics, and there’s a method to this reviewer’s seeming male chauvinism.) Set against the backdrop of this societal upheaval, much of the play’s plot revolves around the relationship between Claudette and the civil rights leader Rev. James Lawrence (Phrederic Semaj). Both characters are married, and their alleged infidelity consumes a lot of this play’s oxygen, and its title, The Good Negro, seems to refer, at least in part, to sexual morality.

On the one hand, it could be argued that what public figures do in their private lives is their own business, that a leader’s sex life is nobody else’s business (other than his/her partners’ and family, that is) and besides, it has no bearing on how well he organizes a demonstration, delivers a speech, etc. As long as he/ she is not privately indulging in behavior he/she publicly condemns, and hypocrisy is not at play, what happens at Birmingham stays in Birmingham.

On the other hand, if a leader’s personal behavior can be perceived in such a way as to cast aspersions on and to discredit his/her cause, then how one acts in the bedroom is indeed a matter for wide concern. This becomes especially complicated and troublesome if one of the hanky panky participants is a woman or man of the cloth (or, in this case, minus his/her cloth). These concerns are amplified when they play into sexual stereotypes, in this case that Blacks are instinctually unrestrained, promiscuous, given to out-of-wedlock births, etc. (A lot of racism centers on the dominant majority culture’s obsessions with and fear of black sexuality.

Reverend Lawrence’s long-suffering wife is named Corinne (Numa Perrier) -- probably a not so subtle reference to Coretta Scott King who, by some accounts, endured the infidelity of her husband.

As long as we are on the subject of sexuality allow me to point out something that happened during the debut performance of The Good Negro at the Stella Adler Theatre, although I assure you, dear reader, I am not trying to be salacious. Claudette appears in a scene with her husband, the uneducated sharecropper, Pelzie (Godwin Obeng), and faces the audience, revealing how full figured she is. In the next scene, presumably wearing exactly the same garments and undergarments, she has a sexual encounter with James. Remarkably, during this scene, Claudette’s erect nipples could be clearly seen (unlike in the previous scene). I know this to be true because not only did I see it, but afterwards I asked another theatergoer, an African American woman, about this, and she verified what I had perceived. This made me wonder: How did Deveaux do that? As this transpired in the Stella Adler Theatre, I mused: “Wow, that Stanislavsky Method really does work!”

Anyway, I’ll leave it up to the reader/ticket buyer to determine whether Wilson’s emphasis on the sexual angle enhances The Good Negro or distracts audiences with trivial gossipy type stuff from the world historical happenings of the triumph over American apartheid. I, however, suspect that Wilson is a showman who knows that sex sells.

Be that as it may, the biggest problem with this otherwise absorbing, compelling drama, which previously played at New York’s Public Theater (may you rest in peace, Joe Papp!), is the diction and pronunciations of several performers. I realize that Stella Adler’s most famous pupil was nicknamed “Mumbles” Brando. But I had trouble understanding what Rev. Lawrence was saying during those speeches at the pulpit, etc., and I doubt that this is the San Diego-born Semaj’s normal offstage speaking voice. It took time for me to get used to the cadences of his Southern accent and delivery. But Obeng’s depiction of Pelzie and Deveaux’s of Claudette are undone by the thespians' accents. They are both supposed to be born and raised Southerners, but you can still hear the Ghana in Obeng’s voice and the Bahamas in Deveaux’s dulcet tones, which diminishes the illusion of the characters they are supposed to be playing. I imagine that Stella Adler would insist that actors must be heard, understood and that their personal accents should not clash onstage with what their roles require.

Nevertheless, The Good Negro’s civil rights subject matter makes it more than worth seeing, as does Carry It On! at the Will Geer Theatricum Botanicum. To be more precise, while Carry It On! does indeed deal with the Civil Rights movement  per se, it also depicts the anti-slavery struggle, the abolitionists (but where was Ol’ John Brown?) and Earnestine Phillips gives rousing portrayals of Harriet Tubman, Sojourner Truth and Rosa Parks. The production also dramatizes the suffragette and feminist movement -- Jane Bacon plays Susan B. Anthony, Willow Geer as Lucy Stone, Melora Marshall as Elizabeth Stanton, director-writer Ellen Geer as Bella Abzug; the labor movement -- Andrew Ravani plays Samuel Gompers; the Latino rights movement -- Daniel Chacon portrays Caesar Chavez; and the peace movement, from Vietnam to Iraq, Cindy Sheehan (the willowy Willow Geer) and Afghanistan.

Artists also appear against this rich panoply of American history, including a wry Mark Twain (Bill Durham), a free spirited Isadora Duncan (Rachel Appelbaum), Robert Frost (Mark Lewis, who doubles as Abe Lincoln), Walt Whitman (William Dennis Hunt) and Lillian Hellman (the righteous Alice Sherman), who delivers her pithy, cutting remarks against the Hollywood Blacklist.

Of course, the cast belts out classic progressive songs, such as Woody Guthrie’s (depicted by Matt Van Winkle) socialistic anthem “This Land is Your Land” and “Union Maid,” with the stirring refrain 'Oh, You Can’t Scare Me I’m Sticking With the Union.' The Theatricum’s tour-de-force is a sort of Howard Zinn-like people’s history of the United States as told through movement and protest songs, speeches and dramatic vignettes, such as Mother Jones (Ellen Geer) leading a long march of child laborers to the posh Long Island vacation home of Pres. Theodore Roosevelt, who refuses to meet with the impoverished children misshapen by their hard work.

Selecting which episodes from American history to depict in a two-acter, and compressing centuries into two and a half hours is a daunting task. Ellen, who compiled, edited, directed, acted and tickles the ivories in Carry It On!, is usually spot on in her choices in terms of crafting a people’s musical history in the tradition of “proletarian drama.” (Some of the vignettes reminded me of the Federal Theatre Project’s Living Newspaper.) But some of the choices left me scratching my head. The entire American Revolution -- you know, that little kafuffle in 1776 over monarchy -- is missing in action. In addition, the events are not always presented in chronological order and while Carry It On! focuses on the U.S.A., Anne Frank (Mollyann Davis as the doomed diarist) makes an appearance, to remind us that people are basically good.

Nevertheless, Carry It On! is a stellar way to spend an afternoon outdoors at the Geers’ amphitheatre in Topanga Canyon, and an excellent, entertaining way to experience American history from a lefty point of view -- especially for the young ‘uns. Last but not least is Gerald C. Rivers, who steals the show with his towering, uncanny performance, if not impersonation, of Dr. Martin Luther King. Just as K.B. Solomon captures Paul Robeson in his one-man show, Rivers movingly distills the essence of Rev. King; the actor’s voice, like the civil rights leader’s, mellifluously flows like honey, reminding us of King’s poetic, moral grandeur. Part of our nation’s soul went when that great apostle of non-violence and human rights was stolen from us, and I feel that America has never recovered from his assassination. Nobody on the national scene today speaks with his moral authority and certitude. Along with millions, I miss him still, very much. (And who, outside of possibly some relatives and FBI goons, really cares if King purportedly strayed from his marital vows?)

As our hard fought for rights are assailed, it’s reassuring to know that with The Good Negro and Carry It On! L.A. theatre is fighting back, as is Neshoba: The Price of Freedom, the new documentary about Chaney, Goodman and Schwerner.

The Good Negro runs through Sept. 19 at the Stella Adler Theatre, Gilbert Stage, located at 6773 Hollywood Blvd., 2nd Floor, Hollywood, California, 90028. For more information: 323/960-1054; or www.Plays411/com/goodnegro

Carry It On! runs through September 26 at the Will Geer Theatricum Botanicum, located at 1419 N. Topanga Canyon Blvd., Topanga, California, 90290. For more information: 310/455-3723 or www.Theatricum.com

FILM REVIEW: SALT OF THIS SEA

Suheir Hammad as Soraya in Salt of this Sea

On the outside inside

By Don Simpson

Born in Brooklyn, Soraya (Suheir Hammad) travels to Palestine to collect her deceased grandfather’s bank account and visit Jaffa where her grandparents were exiled from in 1948. Salt of this Sea opens with Soraya’s arrival to her grandparents’ homeland and the harsh and suspicious realities that she encounters with the Israeli guards at airport customs because of her Palestinian ancestry. After relentless questioning and a strip search, Soraya is permitted to enter.


Soraya hits several other literal and figurative roadblocks. Because she has an Arab name and holds a U.S. passport, as well as her apparent frustration every time her travels are hindered, Soraya is treated like a criminal. After being informed by her grandfather’s bank that his money was “lost” (stolen by Israel) during the 1948 war, Soraya’s anger and frustration with the modern day situation in Palestine escalates.

Feeling marginalized by figures of authority, Soraya bonds with Emad (Saleh Bakri) who decides to join Soraya in her search for freedom. They find themselves faced with only one real option: become the criminals that the authorities already suspect they are. With the assistance of Emad’s friend, Marwan (Riyad Ideis), they commit one crime which provides the trio with enough wealth, confidence and freedom to travel to Jaffa in order to find the homes of their families. The key to their survival in Jaffa is to hide their Arab-ness under the guise of being English-speaking Jewish Americans and Canadians on holiday. (As part of his disguise, Emad wears a t-shirt with the slogan: “America don’t worry, Israel is behind you.”) 

Written and directed by Palestinian filmmaker (and founding member of the Palestinian Filmmakers’ Collective) Annemarie Jacir, Salt of this Sea is a poetic meditation on the trials and tribulations of modern day Palestinians. Jacir intelligently highlights the sheer ridiculousness of the Israeli occupation; a situation in which Palestinians are treated as refugees and criminals within the borders of their ancestral homeland solely because of their ancestry. 

Currently prevented from returning to Palestine, Jacir lives in Jordan.

Friday, August 13, 2010

FILM REVEW: THE EXPENDABLES

Macho men modeling military: a scene from The Expendables.

The title says it all
 

By Don Simpson

The hometown hangout of Barney’s (Sylvester Stallone) ragtag team of mercenary warriors (dubbed “The Expendables”) -- Lee (Jason Statham), Yin (Jet Li), Hale (Terry Crews), Toll Road (Randy Couture), and Gunnar (Dolph Lundgren) -- is the appropriately named Tool’s, a tattoo parlor owned by ex-Expendable, Tool (Mickey Rourke).


Not long after returning from an explosive opening job for hire, Barney goes to church to meet with a man using the not-so witty moniker of Mr. Church (Bruce Willis). A competing mercenary, Trench (Arnold Schwarzenegger), is also present, but after an exchange of the cleverest dialogue of the script -- fed by the nostalgia of seeing Stallone, Willis and Schwarzenegger onscreen together (sans Planet Hollywood) -- Trench declines Mr. Church’s offer and promptly exits -- leaving Barney’s team as the only option. 

Mr. Church’s assigned mission seems to be routine (and illegal): overtake General Gaza (David Zayas), the evil dictator of the small island country of Vilena. Barney and Lee fly to Vilena to meet their rebel contact, Sandra (Giselle Itie). Within a matter of minutes, they learn that the true enemy of the people is an ex-CIA agent turned cocaine kingpin, James Monroe (Eric Roberts). Learning that their assignment is a fraud, Barney and Lee are forced to flee the island with a bang. Distraught with guilt about failing and abandoning Sandra, Barney and his team return to Vilena for an explosive grand finale.

A lackluster attempt by director Stallone to rekindle the bombastic blockbuster actioners of the 1980s and 1990s, The Expendables is a tired testosterone fueled sausage fest. Penned by Dave Callaham and Stallone, the script is monopolized by lame one-liners and totally lacks substance (no surprises there!). In come circles, that would be fine if there was ample action to compensate for the lack of narrative, yet surprisingly the film only features a few epic action sequences. Instead, Stallone opts to give himself and Lee each a female love interest. Moreover, Lee’s subplot is a long-winded and failed attempt to give Lee some depth and generate sympathy for his character. Basically, Lee returns home from assignment to find his significant other, Lacy (Charisma Carpenter), shacking up with another man. Barney’s tiresome sub-plot consists of him repeatedly ogling and pining over Sandra.

Admittedly, I knew The Expendables would more than likely not be my cuppa tea, but I was holding out hope that Stallone would have the foresight to either go totally self-reflexive (JCVD) or over-the-top camp (A-Team). Except for the brief cameos of Willis and Schwarzenegger (and Lundgren’s lobotomized performance), there is very little focus on the elephant in the room: the resurrection of the ancient relics of President Ronald Reagan-era action heroes. Instead, Stallone attempted to make a modern day action film and he wound up with an expendable one that is over-reliant on CGI effects, including cringe-inducing CGI blood and gore, while lacking everything else.
 

Thursday, August 12, 2010

FILM REVIEW: SCOTT PILGRIM VS. THE WORLD

Scott Pilgrim (Michael Cera) and Ramona Flowers (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) in Scott Pilgrim vs. the World.  

Video love games
 

By Don Simpson

The narrative begins as Scott Pilgrim (Michael Cera), an unemployed 20-something indie-rawker living in Toronto, is “dating” (the quotes refer to the fact that they have not sealed the deal with a kiss) an awesomely named Catholic high-school student, Knives (Ellen Wong). 


Scott lives in a quaint studio apartment sharing a bed with a snarky gay roommate, Wallace (Kieran Culkin). Alongside guitarist Stephen (Mark Webber) and drummer Kim (Alison Pill), Scott plays a gorgeous Rickenbacker bass (and from the murky sound of it I wouldn’t be surprised if Scott uses Super-Fuzz and Big Muff effects pedals) in the fuzzed-out three-piece garage band called Sex Bob-omb (a reference to Super Mario Bros. 2, Bob-ombs are living bombs that wander around aimlessly and eventually explode).

For no apparent reason other than fate, Scott begins dreaming about a cute punky chick with Manic Panic hair –- Ramona Flowers (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) –- who skates around on rollerblades. (What indie-rock boy hasn’t dreamed of a girl like Ramona?) The girl of Scott’s dreams materializes into reality and Scott begins to stalk her, which is how Scott discovers that Ramona delivers packages for Amazon.ca and she recently relocated to Toronto from New York after breaking-up with Gideon (Jason Schwartzman).

It is not long before Scott and Ramona decide that they are dating (and Scott tosses a proverbial dagger into Knives’ heart); but in order to successfully date Ramona, Scott must defeat all seven of her evil exes via video game-style duels (a not-so-subtle metaphor for overcoming relationship baggage). 

As if living in a video game, Scott earns a reward of coins each time he conquers an evil ex (for other good deeds he receives different prizes such as extra lives and magic swords). The subsequent adversaries become increasingly difficult to defeat as they each possess special powers -- like Todd (Brandon Routh), a vegan with telekinetic powers, who gains his powers from using 100 percent of his brain (non-vegans only use 10% of their brain). As they battle, the characters take a licking and they keep on ticking -- at least until Scott finally determines his adversary’s weakness and delivers the all important knock-out blow (“K.O.!”). It's an all too cute and clever (albeit violent) nod to the hyper-real arcade in which these characters, and much of the film’s audience, exist.

Playfully directed and co-written by Edgar Wright (Shaun of the Dead; Hot Fuzz) and reverentially based on Bryan Lee O'Malley’s uber-hipster series of wide-eyed manga-styled graphic novels, Scott Pilgrim vs. the World offers a keen pop perspective of the worlds of indie-rock bands and video games. The only inkling of reality mustered from Scott Pilgrim vs. the World is the film’s spot-on portrayal of the bitter and jaded rivalries between unknown bands clambering for attention in a hotbed of underground music. Scott Pilgrim’s moniker itself is a reference to a 7” single from an obscure and defunct Canadian girl-rock band named Plumtree.

Within this heightened unreality, the characters exist in a uniquely surreal and sugary pop world of their own. The characters' emotions which are all but reduced to love and heartbreak are contextualized into exaggerated gestures -- tears, rage, unbridled glee -- like a silent film. The highly superficial character of Scott has bares no psychological depth. We learn very little about Scott, except that he doesn’t own a cell phone or understand how to use the internet, and we gain no understanding of his true feelings for Knives or Ramona. With little rhyme nor reason, Scott is just going through the motions as if being controlled by someone standing off-screen playing with a joystick (he even jumps from scene to scene as if time and place are irrelevant)…and lucky for Scott, the master of his destiny has mastered the game of life. 

The real life environs of Toronto are filmed in a fantastic manner, with random doors that appear out of nowhere and serve as portals (thus helping Ramona deliver her Amazon.ca packages all that much faster) as well as clever gaming-inspired CGI effects, adding to the hyperactive video game mystique of the film. Functioning as a hypertextualized mash-up of pop culture references from the 90s and 00s -- thus lending the film a certain timeless quality -- Scott Pilgrim does well to push the boundaries of reality in all kinds of directions. 

Not the typical mid-August Hollywood fare, as long as your good senses are not insulted by some shameless stereotypes and a splattering of hyper-violence (though very little blood is shed), Scott Pilgrim vs. the World is an entertaining flick that has a very original soundtrack. Beck composed the music played by Sex Bob-omb; Nigel Godrich composed the original score; Metric, Broken Social Scene, Cornelius, Dan the Automator, Kid Koala, and Beck’s father David Campbell also contributed tracks.

FILM REVIEW: PEEPLI LIVE

Caste away

By John Esther 

Thanks to a lifetime of hardship resulting in hopelessness and a controversial government program, thousands of Indian farmers continue to commit suicide. The number of farmers who have committed suicide in India between 1997 and 2007 now stands at 182,936.  That is about one suicide for every 31 minutes. Since the farmers cannot pay off their land and the government provides aid to the families of indebted Indian farmers who have committed suicide, why not?


A fictional account of the capitalist crisis met with government response, writer-director Anusha Rizvi's Peepli Live tells the tale of two brothers, Natha (Omkar Das Manikpuri) and Budhia (Raghubir Yadav), who are about to lose their plot of rural land and want to take advantage of the government program. The question is: who is going to hang himself for the greater good?


After the brothers decide which one will die, the story breaks out with the media, government, politicains and entrepenuers descending on the small rural village to see if a suicide will take place. Sadly humorous, everybody has an agenda. Votes, ratings and money are at stake and nobody cares if a nobody sends back the gift of life. Will he do it?


A better writer than director, the strength of Rizvi's Peepli Live is the film's unsentimental portrayal of the poor. Far more Émile Zola and Shohei Imamura than John Steinbeck and Michael Moore, the films depicts India's lowest cast as ignorant and brutish, with adults and children prone to yelling, violence, excessive inebriation and self preservation at any cost. This honesty prevents sympathy for the self/society-doomed protagonist, which translates into a more complex look at the issues at hand. If a man and those around him are miserable, malicious loudmouths, is his suicide less tragic? If so, then within the context of the film it qualifies attitudes toward suicide, suicide for money, how bad is India's banking system, mainstream media, does a society get the government it deserves, etc.


The film's depiction of the poor is not to suggest it is a Wall Street editorial where the poor are a necessary good(s). The upper and middle class castes are hardly noble, either. They move in ways to preserve their self interests. The community is an afterthought. The government would rather pay for a suicide than use those same resources to prevent one. Even if an individual in Peepli Live does speak out against the plight of his countrymen and countrywomen, there is nothing to be done when the nation's policies are motivated and based on response rather than prevention. The plight of the farmers is just another incident of a global economy based on conflict.

Complex in the context, Peepli Live is about despair and doom. And while that may sound like a  depressing time at the movies, consider that with a 104-minute running time, over three Indian farmers will have, on average, committed suicide during that time. 









EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: TOM SHEPARD

Harmain Khan in Tom Shepard's Whiz Kids.

Science function

By John Esther


At a time when American teens rank 24th in the world in math and science comes Whiz Kids, Tom Shepard’s delightful documentary about three 17-year-old high school students -- Ana Cisneros, Harmain Khan and Kelydra Welcker -- who compete for the Science Talent Search. The nation’s oldest and most prestigious science competition, these working-class teenagers need some of that precious Science Talent Research prize money in order to afford college


A Science Talent Search finalist himself in 1987, Shepard moved to filmmaking during his years at Stanford. His previous credits include, Scout’s Honor, about gays in the Boy Scouts, and Knocking, a film about Jehovah Witnesses.

Currently living and working in San Francisco, we caught up with Shepard to talk about science, storytelling and red harvester ants. 

JEsther Entertainment: I understand you were in the Science Fair back in 1987 doing something about harvesting ant pheromones?
Tom Shepard: [Laughs]. Yes, I was actually cutting the abdomens off of red harvester ants in Colorado Springs, playing with their pheromones. I was quite the science geek when I was kid. 


JE: How did you mesh the majors of biology and film at Stanford? 
TS: I know there was some research done about those who were finalists in the Science Fair and is was like eighty percent or more of them go on to PhDs in sciences, doctors, working in labs. I felt oriented in that direction when I went to college – maybe I felt a little obligated. Then I took cultural studies courses -- GLBT studies, film studies, African-American studies – and it was more interesting to me. I was definitely more interested in telling stories. I had already taken all the pre-med courses so it was easier to tack on the film degree than scrap the courses.
 

JE: Did you approach films from a biological for scientific perspective?
TS: Only to the extent I took some ethnography classes that were a little bit more like cultural anthropology. That was as close as I got to “scientific” filmmaking. 


JE: In light of the processes of hypothesis, research and documentation, it seems more natural you would make documentaries rather than fictional features.
TS: I think so. I feel like the chance to make changes is greater. Educate people and open hearts at the same time.


JE: You mentioned that before in something I read. Do you find science is often too cold?
TS: I did not learn in a cold, dispassionate way. I learned it in communal ways and going to science fairs. It was always really engaging, working in the lab. We hoped one of the outcomes of Whiz Kids is to humanize science, make it more accessible. We would have work-in-progress screenings of the film and really educated people would come and they would start to hear kids talk about a level of his or her research and you could see the eyes start glossing over. That’s really unfortunate. Look at the issues Whiz Kids raises and issues we’re now suppose to debate. The BP oil spill is a really good example. If you have a background in science, you might know how you want your congressperson to deal with it. It has changed since the time I was in college. Beforehand there was an emphasis on having kids specialize very early and then you go into a PhD program and you are the expert in some very specific, nanotechnology -- at the expense of seeing the larger picture.
 

JE: Why did you pick these three students in particular?
TS: We were drawn to these kids because they didn’t have those sorts of opportunities and yet there were doing it on their own. They had family and mentors but they were largely pursuing this on perseverance and deep belief in themselves -- that what they were doing mattered. They didn’t come from environments where there had been traditions. 


JE: The film argues we also need to get this country back into a more scientific mode.
TS: Yes, we do need to increase the number of engineers and chemists, but we need to make the whole of society more technically literate -- make science more accessible at an early age. Science is a really cool thing. It’s so creative, intellectual and engaging on so many fronts.

JE: Lastly, what do you think about interviews where you talk about yourself and your work? Do they serve the work? Should the work speak for itself?
TS: That’s an interesting question. It’s great to have both things. The work should speak for itself, but oftentimes a work that’s reduced to an hour or 90 minutes raises more questions than it answers. That’s why people love going to film festivals. They love to talk about film or the filmmakers and understand the choices you made and what would you do in the future.

For information on how to order a DVD or upcoming screenings, go to http://whizkidsmovie.com